The goal of the Championships

Jacques Naude, the first South African to score a goal in international competition. Photo: Markus Bjurén

South Africa had a goal in the Championships — to score at least one goal. In their final match South Africa, held scoreless in every previous match, faced Switzerland. In the first half South Africa was down 0-5. But in the second half Jacques Naude scored a goal on a penalty.

“I got him around the neck pulled him off,” said Naude when asked how he managed to give South Africa its first goal in World Championship play.

Prior to their first game the South Africans said that they had heard that the USA had only managed to make single goal at three world championships.

“We want to do better than that,” said one of the team. Goal achieved.

When South African diplomat Rudi Janse van Vuuren received a phone call, informing him that his country was represented at the World Championships he was incredulous.

“I thought someone was pulling my leg at first,” confessed van Vuuren, who later joined Team South African at their hotel for a beer.

Sweden wins with almost no time on the clock in sudden death overtime.

A three-strong German break for the goal with one minute to go looks bad for Sweden, but Felicia Nyberg catches them from above and snatches the outstretched ball. Less than minute remains. It will be a penalty shootout…. No, suddenly with five seconds left Ann-Sofi Krakau, perhaps Sweden’s top player, certainly a physical and explosive athlete, is over the goal and shoves one in. An amazing finish. The Germans have been somewhat unlucky but possession must be converted into goals or it means nothing but a bitter taste… no that’s not true. Germany played very well. It is a hard defeat but they can be proud.

Group play is over

From now on we are in the quarter finals. For the rest of the Championships there will be no more undecided matches. Now, the event of a tie, there will first be a 15-minute overtime period of sudden death play. If that produces no resolution, then the game will go to a penalty shootout.

All 12 players are allowed to shoot, providing the game is not decided by a mathematical impossibility for the team that has fallen behind.

In the penalty shootouts if the goalie commits an infraction, he or she receives a two round seat in the penalty box.

German women overcome dogged Colombian defense

The match between Colombia and German provided a stark contrast in strategies. The German team, collectively more than 10 percent larger in terms of length and weight, wanted to play a battle on the bottom, using rhythm and speed to punch through. This approach was no doubt correct but the Colombian women, who could not rip or wrestle the balls away in one-on-one play, had a strategy of their own.

Every time they clamped onto a German player another would close in so that German player ended up floating to the surface. At times some of the Colombian players would attach themselves to the balls and curl up in a protective fetal position. It was impossible for the German players to pass or score with such large remora on the balls. Worse the Colombian player had no interest in symbiosis. As soon as two came into the picture there was battle.

The Colombians could easily have been down 3 – 0 at the half but their goalies were very quick to seal the basket.

“They have a lot of air,” said the husband of one of the German players.

Conditioning is a vital advantage in underwater rugby. The Colombians were on the defensive much of the game. Sometimes when attacks were mounted and the goalie were in danger of being lifted off, their teammates usually the backs and or other goalie would push them down on the rim.

Germany was the stronger team but it looked as if the Colombians might pull off a long shot victory by doing approximately the same as the Japanese women did to the Americans in the World Cup. It was not to be though, as the Colombians had too few break away threats to catch the German 2 goal lead.

The other teams will have to adjust themselves to beat Colombia. Germany are after all the defending Champions, so this was not a surprize result.

Germany holds off persistent Denmark

We have just watched the best match of the Championships so far. In the opening minutes a very strong German team looked as if they might dominate, but Denmark got successively tougher as the match progressed.

In the first quarter of the game Germany often managed to methodically build up attacks. The Danes looked somewhat passive with the team’s forwards seemingly content to wait for passes, instead of challenging the tempo established by their opponents. The danger for Denmark was that during the exchange of backs the Germans would make a rush backed by 3 or 4 players.

Shortly before the 10 minute mark, the collection of half fresh lungs outside the Danish goal gave Germany’s Stefan Klett a chance to flip the switch, putting one on the score board. Not long after that Dennis Pahl made a second goal for Germany. Two to zero might have spelt the end for another team but not this one from the country lying so close to Germany. 

Denmark’s lapse was no burnt-out fuse. The Danes reset the circuit breaker and in workman-like fashion gradually deprived their opponents of the tempo control strategy. It did not come easily. On more than one occasion, though they did not have physical dominance, the Danes scooped up sub-prime Deutsche passes and tried to go to the bank. With around 5 minutes remaining Denmark’s Simon Schäfer put in goal, erasing Germany’s self assurance.

Perhaps frustrated at the trend, the Germans committed two roughing fouls, which only encouraged the Danes to dig in and fight harder. After half-time the Danish forechecking became urgent. If in the first half Danish counterattacks quickly met resistance, in the second half they extended their forward movement. Every time they closed on the German goal, two Russia spectators rooting for Denmark said, “come-on! Tie game now.”

The Danish pressure had a sort of increasing grimness that the Germans had no answer for. However, in the end team Germany  hung on to their one nil lead to the end. The last few minute were nail biting entertainment.

Davrell Tien poolside 

Finland prevails over Colombia after a scoreless first half

First match of the Helsinki 2011 World Championships, as originally reported August 16, 2011.

The game was very tight for the first 15 minutes. Neither team was able to score. With few seconds remaining in the first half both teams received team warnings for holding.

Rami Riikonen Photo: Facebook

The action resumes and Rami Riikonen scores to give Finland a 1-0 lead.

With 8 minutes remaining in the second half a Pasi Aman of Finland is sent out for roughing. A time out is called by Finland. The game resumes but Colombia is unable to capitalize on the advantage. With half of the penalty time remaining, Colombia’s German Castro (No. 14) gets a call for holding. Since there is already a team warning, he heads to the penalty box.

The sides are even, 5 against 5. Finland’s captain Reijo Rantemäki scores another. Jussi Jokinen follows him shortly after again. The final result is 4 – 0 in favor of defending Champions, Finland.

The third Finnish goal was a beauty. The goalie clamped on to the ball and floated up with the Finnish attacker. Once the Finnish player wrestled it back a second Finnish player planted it in the empty goal. Two other Finns players lurked in the background.

Colombia had better than 50 percent possession in the first half. Their forwards played very tough defense. However, after Finland gained a two point lead they played coolly and prevented the increasingly frustrated Colombians any realistic chance of coming back. The additional two goals came as Colombia splintered.

Colombia has a strong team but they must now win all their remaining group matches to remain in medal contention.

Updated: with information from the score sheet

Norway prevails over Sweden 1 – 0

Second penalty shot for holding the basket decides game in favor of Norway.

Late in the first half Swedish goalkeeper Anna Överby goes into the penalty box for gripping the basket. Sweden survives the 2-minute power play. In the second half around 8 minutes remaining the referee calls basket holding again. Penalty shot. The Swedish goalie easily holds off the attacker and the Swedish players on deck scream with delight.

However, the Swedes are caught again. The goalkeeper is not a large player so it is easy for her to slip a shoulder too deep. The ref calls for a second penalty.

Now Felicia Nyberg (No 10) of the Swedes must face another penalty shot attempt. This time the Norway’s Karine Haugland harasses her from the bottom. Nyberg cannot risk letting a crack open. There are 45 seconds for a penalty and Haugland shrewdly heads up for a deep breath and comes back like a seal who has figured out a fisherman’s trap. She has a stressed goalie short of air and in goes the ball.

Swedish Captain Helena Fagraeus. Photo: Ann-Sofi Krakau.

Sweden is down but not out. The action now has a frenetic quality. The Swedes are anxious to equalize. They come in more aggressively but they cannot break the Norwegian defense. With relatively little time remaining the Norwegians tie up the Swedish captain Helena Fagraeus on the surface in a tiring battle to nowhere.

Time is running out. A free ball awarded Norway gives the side a chance to call for a time out. Perhaps not a good move because it allows the Swedes to rally for a final attempt. They take the ball from Norway but Norway takes it back. Norway then burns up the remaining minute and half passing safely in the corner.

Norway has too many players in the water. A time penalty is awarded Sweden but only three seconds are left the Swedish and Norwegian players are taking off their masks as the meaningless free ball goes into play. It’s over. Norway has a victory under their suits. Sweden must regroup.

Karine Haugland is one of Norway’s top scorers. Photo: Stine Røsok Dahl.

Norway versus Sweden scoreless first half

This was match commentary from a women’s match in Helskini, first published August 16, 2011

Both teams have seen a player sent to the penalty box for holding the goal. Still no score, even with the advantage of being a woman up, neither can do much. Too many dropped balls. Play is in the middle a bit too much.

Both teams are hesitating to take it into the basket area. It hurts there and there are risks but you cannot score without some pain. “I was expecting a bit more but it’s the first match,” says one a Danish ref on his break.

Turkey leading Spain 3 – 1 in the second half

Report from an ongoing match during the 2011 Helisinki World Championships originally published August 16, 2011

Two strong teams are meeting. The 3 – 1 Turkish lead is the product of having more attacking players swarming around the goal. Turkey has been tougher in clinched ball situations, ripping it away from the Spaniards. In the second half Spain has been more aggressive and they need to be.

Vocal Spanish fans punctuate the spacicious pool hall with shouts of encouragement. “There is free player beneath ,” cries a woman, as if the players below could hear her.This is a nice place to play. The doors are open to let in air. One side of the pool hall is all glass, giving the Championships good light, although it is overcast. How is the video stream? Let us know.

The Turkish players sing the national anthem in salute to their opponents, for whom this was a hard blow. The Spanish players look distracted in defeat. Will they be able to pull themselves together.

Why the US did not send a team to Helsinki

The situation for underwater rugby in the USA / interview of Rolexi Pinzon (New Jersey Hammerheads) First published August 6, 2011.

Davrell,

Thanks for your interest on UW Rugby in the US and Canada. Certainly as you mentioned the sudden change of plans from Colombia to Finland and short notice affected our participation. For both US and Canada rugby players this meant a big difference and although we had the interest to participate up to the last minute, in the end we just couldn’t get our teams organized.

Since I was involved in the effort of getting a USA team participating back in the UW Rugby World’s, I would like to answer your questions and clarify the current status of UW Rugby in the US and Canada. At this point we are in constant communication with players in Canada and we are trying to do a common effort to develop UW Rugby in both countries.

Where do the North American teams stand right now in terms of competitiveness at the top level?

We have a mix of well experienced players and very enthusiastic new players. There are three clubs in the US that are constantly practicing and promoting the sport. One of the teams (New Jersey Hammerheads) has been very active locally organizing along other clubs tournaments and clinics and also internationally trying to participate outside the US and get the top level experience needed in the sport, even inviting players from other clubs and players from areas without a club so they can get to experience a high level competition and learn. The East Haven Makos (from Connecticut) is a team that dissapeared for a while but is back with many new and enthusiastic players that is growing really fast. This team has been a great supporter of UW Rugby events. The oldest of the US teams (Quincy UWR) has been active for the longer time and has a lot of experienced players.

Are the skills and tactics up there?

Yes, that has been one of the goals for the clubs. We are constantly in contact with coaches from different teams and experience in all levels (national, league and world championship) and we are always trying to develop, practice and implement both skills and tactics. A big help on this has been the participation of experienced players from other countries like Colombia and Germany.

3) How is UWR growing?

Rugby has been around in the US since the late 90’s and in Canada since 5 years ago

Honestly it has been very slow the last years because of different reasons. First, it is extremely difficult to get access to a pool. Since the sport is not an usual or common sport, support from pools or municipalities is very hard to get. Distances are also a big problem since players sometimes are really far from practice venues. Pools and distances have made extremely difficult to get new teams organized.

The good thing is that right now we have clubs that have been active from long time and clubs that are back in practice again. We have 5 clubs (including some from Canada) that are relatively “close” and all looking into organizing a yearly schedule of events that will help to get an organized calendar.

Yes, UW Rugby is somehow different from waterpolo in regards to swiming skills. You might not be a good swimmer and do good, but still you need basic swimming skills. Being a good swimmer makes a big difference and the learning curve is much shorter.

Since we dont have enough players in the clubs to have men and women’s teams, we play with mixed teams as they do here with UW Hockey teams. The ideal will be to have women teams & tournaments but that’s going to take a long time.

Katie told me that the Michigan players driver four hours to practice in Chicago during the summers. Wow! At the same time a city like Chicago could support a league. Is getting pool time difficult in the USA?

We had no idea of someone playing Rugby in Chicago!!..Thats good news! We’ll contact Katie. As I mentioned getting pool time is extremely difficult because of the costs, insurance, and lack of interest from pool managers/entities to support the sport and also they are afraid of liability issues.

How many play in the USA today?

Hard to say but I would think there are 75-100 active/inactive players.

In Europe UW hockey is big some places while UWR in others. How is it in the US?

UW Hockey is bigger in the US. There are about +/-25 clubs in the country and tournaments all year round.

For UW Rugby we have 3 organized clubs and 2 developing. I’ve heard of groups practicing in Montana and from your email another one in Chicago.

In the case of Canada the situation is similar. UW Hockey is pretty big, but they have now 2 new clubs that are growing really fast.

The good thing is that in both countries we have players that come from countries where UW Rugby is big and have experience in club, league, national and international levels, especially from Colombia and Germany, and that are pushing to develop the sport to the next level.

Do you think USA will be ready next time? How about cup play?

I certainly think that we will be ready for the next Worlds. We have started a common effort with the teams from Canada to make UW Rugby grow locally, and hopefully for next year we will have 1 team from each country (Canada and US) participating in an international tournament (probably in Colombia). From then the next step will be the Champions Cup and the Worlds.

At this point I’m not sure about this year’s Champions Cup if thats what you refer about. Right now I think it will be too soon, but we are thinking about it.

Any sponsorship?

None!

What is the balance of foreign immigrant players to natives?

Hard to say, but I think right now with only active players it is 35% immigrants and 65% local. That varies per club and also that will change if I get to contact Katie and get information from Chicago.

Davrell, for more exact information from canadian teams you can contact the following people (I’ll copy them on this email)

Tom Elliot

Club Liberation (Brandford, ON)

elliottp@mcmaster.ca

Cesar Florez

CAMO UW Rugby (Montreal)

cesaugflorez@hotmail.comSome think UWR has an attraction that is different from water polo. You need to be a good swimmer to get into water polo but UWR is somehow different; people of different levels/men and women can compete together. Correct? If so, how does that affect recruitment?